tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4145254890040695192.comments2012-09-19T03:35:07.516-07:00The Maths GeekThe Maths Geekhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03425659585009977962noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4145254890040695192.post-81389490457567793322012-09-19T03:35:07.516-07:002012-09-19T03:35:07.516-07:00Nicely worked with problem, you are good in teachi...Nicely worked with problem, you are good in teaching about trapezium and you made your blog more attractive by solving each problem in easy way.<br /><a href="http://www.tutorcircle.com/tutoring-pg.html" rel="nofollow">free online math tutor chat</a>rajputhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11575599663896691429noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4145254890040695192.post-91720328651886378592011-10-22T14:46:35.269-07:002011-10-22T14:46:35.269-07:002 meters2 metersAAdhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12372928021869006620noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4145254890040695192.post-48487113307967655342011-08-05T13:43:13.344-07:002011-08-05T13:43:13.344-07:00I was going over this website on
Vedic Maths ,......I was going over this website on <br /><a href="http://www.vedicmathsindia.org/" rel="nofollow">Vedic Maths</a> ,....it says th sources have been given by the current shankaracharya of puri.../can u pls check it out before making stupid claims.Raghuthamanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08629568278878665501noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4145254890040695192.post-71331527513212739682011-06-24T09:21:35.421-07:002011-06-24T09:21:35.421-07:00He claimed to have found uncovered the system by i...<i>He claimed to have found uncovered the system by intensely studying the old Vedas.</i><br /><br />Can you provide evidence for your claim (that he claimed such a thing)? Specifically, that he made the claim himself (not that others later have claimed it).<br /><br />I don't recall it being present in the "source" book from which all this Vedic mathematics stuff originated. I don't have access to the book right now, but as I recall, the claim in that book is that he spent several years meditating (or something), and the sixteen(?) sutras were "revealed" to him. He then interpreted the sutras as applied to various calculation problems, and found them. By his <i>definition</i> of Vedas as "all knowledge" and/or "shruti/revealed knowledge", these sutras are therefore part of the Vedas. The book already very explicitly says that the sutras don't exist in any recension of the vedas: only that on logical grounds (the topic etc.), they must be part of the Atharva Veda. The book is also explicit that he more or less developed the methods himself.<br /><br />The contention here is the difference between the modern historian's definition of the Vedas as specific finite texts bound to a certain historical period, and the "traditional" definition he uses.<br /><br />Instead of mentioning that you're merely rejecting his definition and sticking to yours, you have (as far as I can tell) attributed false claims to him that he never made, called it a fraud, etc. Certainly, most of the people promoting Vedic mathematics today are committing fraud -- but I'm specifically taking issue with your "he claimedâ€¦" part. Please substantiate your claim, or retract it.displaynamehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09068351772472305473noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4145254890040695192.post-3025430674159329602011-06-16T23:11:16.815-07:002011-06-16T23:11:16.815-07:00nice puzzle
http://www.m4maths.comnice puzzle<br />http://www.m4maths.comM4Mathshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12894769591359684616noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4145254890040695192.post-46138328476490646832011-05-27T09:12:46.485-07:002011-05-27T09:12:46.485-07:00solve: 1/sqrt(9-d*d) + 1/sqrt(16-d*d) = 1
answer:...solve: 1/sqrt(9-d*d) + 1/sqrt(16-d*d) = 1<br />answer: d = 2.6032877544Peterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02257037839617777455noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4145254890040695192.post-40811083117687258582011-05-27T04:49:05.893-07:002011-05-27T04:49:05.893-07:00assuming the walls are perpendicular to the floor
...assuming the walls are perpendicular to the floor<br /><br />http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=solve+1%3D+1%2Fsqrt%289-d^2%29+%2B+1%2Fsqrt%2816-d^2%29mzzzzbhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03929114290648725147noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4145254890040695192.post-28300364889363626242011-05-27T03:55:01.300-07:002011-05-27T03:55:01.300-07:00@Aaron sqrt(143/17)+sqrt(143/10) = 6.68
That would...@Aaron sqrt(143/17)+sqrt(143/10) = 6.68<br />That would make both ladders fall down. Sorry :(The Maths Geekhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03425659585009977962noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4145254890040695192.post-56124717531019746332011-05-26T15:58:57.956-07:002011-05-26T15:58:57.956-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Aaronhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00077300367246739030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4145254890040695192.post-40368396015577275752011-05-25T20:30:41.705-07:002011-05-25T20:30:41.705-07:00nice one!nice one!Luciahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07416546767618654140noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4145254890040695192.post-852572692164394502011-05-16T12:26:37.391-07:002011-05-16T12:26:37.391-07:00This is very interesting.
Is it possible to get ...This is very interesting. <br /><br />Is it possible to get access to your data?Behzadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08642469673758098838noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4145254890040695192.post-29525921029045860282011-04-19T06:58:18.664-07:002011-04-19T06:58:18.664-07:00Here is my attempt: https://github.com/Eelis/geord...Here is my attempt: https://github.com/Eelis/geordi/blob/master/prelude/bin_iomanip.hppEelishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02249230695203108467noreply@blogger.com